Ethics nike case

Corporate Governance

The categorical imperative principle puts a specific decision or action in the following context: Should we inflict western values on this society. Nike is a widely recognized brand, which is the reason several other host governments became involved in the sweatshop case. Their concerns about making profits are legitimate.

These solutions link compliance with financial performance. Nike focused its efforts on becoming a primary member of the Fair Labor Association, a worker rights watchdog. These recommendations aim at improving the working conditions for labourers in the Nike-aligned factories with a new set of proactive tools.

The company outsourced its manufacturing plants to several countries in order to lessen costs and become more efficient in productivity. The explanation and well-supported rationales are given. Figure 4 lists the costs involved in producing shoes.

Developed countries will also be better off because their workers can shift to jobs that they do better. Should the Conference adopt a new Convention revising this Convention in whole or in part, then, unless the new Convention otherwise provides: Nike was also criticized for failure to follow child labor laws by hiring children who were not allowed to work and forcing them to work overtime for below minimal pay.

Assuming the companies that Nike contracts are relatively large, an increase in wages would significantly better the lives of employees while only slightly reducing profit margins or slightly increasing product price. Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals 3rd ed.

Furthermore, the deeply embedded historical animosity between Korean and Taiwanese managers and Vietnamese workers has added a cultural sensitivity to the entire issue.

Ethics Nike Case

Meanwhile, Air Jordan XX3 was released infocusing on shoes that support players to perform well in the sport. They considered slavery similar to sweat shops. Kant, Immanuel ; translated by James W. Like any ethic question, there might note be one agreeable answer to a group of debaters.

The Management of service operations. O Box Lusaka E-mail njovuj yahoo. Secondly, since workers will be trained at performing multiple tasks, it will result in a higher skilled, higher paid workforce.

The abolitionist movement spread into workers movements such as trade unions and labour based political groups; marxists and socialists.

There are both arguments against and for sweatshops. Explain some of the ethical issues that Nike is facing in the case. Unfortunately, companies like Nike must overcome some difficult obstacles before establishing a successful business in a foreign country.

Values and Ethics Case Studies. See also Lessons Learned. Military Ethics Case Studies, from JSCOPE The Early Retirement of Gen Ronald R. Fogleman, Chief of Staff, United States Air Force, interview in Airpower Journal, Spring Nike lawsuit (Kasky v Nike, re denial of labour abuses) Marc Kasky filed suit against Nike in California state court in suing the company for unfair and deceptive practices under California’s Unfair Competition Law and False Advertising Law.

Nike, long the target of sweatshop allegations, yesterday produced the most comprehensive picture yet of the factories that produce its footwear and clothing, detailing admissions of abuses.

Case Study into Nike The Daily mails perspective Nike is a company that has caused different rumours about the ways in which they treat their employees.

The decades since the Pinto case have allowed us to dissect Ford’s decision-making process and apply the latest behavioral ethics theory to it. We believe that the patterns evident there.

In the case of Nike Inc., these stakeholders’ interests include high quality products and reasonable prices. The company addresses these interests through significant R&D investments. For example, Nike continues to provide products with high quality and advanced technology.

Ethics nike case
Rated 0/5 based on 52 review
Corporate Social Responsibility Nike | Essay Example